Strategies

Strategies

The strategies we offer, and the ones we are forward-tracking before any of them can be offered.

Strategies on offer

Both meet the five tests on their backtests. The five tests were written down in October 2026. Full figures, every trade and the forward record are on each strategy's page.

ICT22 ModelOn offer
Nasdaq-100 futures (NQ / MNQ) · 1 minute
See the strategy
Midas ModelOn offer
Gold futures (GC / MGC) · 1 minute
See the strategy

On the forward track

These strategies are not offered. Each one is tracked separately on simulated TradingView fills from the date shown. The single strategies run with no links to our other strategies; the two combined books share trades with Alpha, Bravo and the strategies we offer, as their pages say. We publish every trade each one takes, losing trades included. They carry codenames; a strategy gets a product name only if it is offered. Ranked by forward results, as explained below the table.

#StrategyRouteProgress to eligibleForward-trackedRecent 40 days
Loading…

How the ranking works: strategies are ordered by their forward score, the net result of their forward-tracked trades in R divided by the normal spread of that strategy's own backtest results over the same number of trading days. A score counts once a strategy has at least 20 trading days and 10 forward trades; before that it is listed as too early to score, at zero. Ties are broken by the share of eligibility conditions met, then by the drawdown test (needed before anything is offered), then by forward trading days. The ranking does not decide anything: a strategy graduates only by meeting the threshold below. "Recent 40 days" shows our 40-day check and the 40-day total to today, on each strategy's backtest and forward-tracked trades together; once a strategy has 40 forward trading days the total is all forward trades. Under it, the form names where that total sits against the strategy's own standard deviation (Strong run, Positive, Soft patch, Weak run), with how many of the 40 days were forward-tracked; it does not change the grade or the order. All results are in R (each trade's result divided by the risk it took), after commission; forward results come from simulated fills.

Many prop firms restrict or ban trading around major news releases, and their rules differ. Each strategy's page says how it handles them; check your own firm's rules for what it requires.

How a strategy graduates

We wrote the threshold down on 17 October 2026, before any tracking began. Any change goes in a new dated version, the old one is kept, and the change is stated on this page.

Changes so far. 17 October: the regime route (2 below), added before any tracking began. 17 October: on the regime route the 40-day check looks only at the recent 40-day results, and every strategy is tracked on its own, with no links to our other strategies; made after one tracker had started, so that tracker was replaced and its record starts again from the new one. 18 October: the small-target option (3 below), after four trackers had started; it applies only to a strategy declared before its own tracking began, which so far is one. 18 October: the two combined books are measured against each trade's own risk instead of a fixed dollar unit; Delta moved to the regime route and its forward record started again. 18 October: the 40-day check grades on the share of the last 60 trading days with a positive 40-day total (more than 75% HEALTHY, 50% to 75% GOOD, under 50% CONCERN; PAUSE for a sharp drop now), replacing an earlier steadiness rule. 20 October: before a standard-route strategy is offered it must also beat every strategy we already offer on the same market, on the Sharpe ratio of its daily results in R over the same dates; one that is eligible and meets test 5 but not this comparison is shown as benched. On the regime route the same comparison is shown, not applied. Made after the first forward trades and before any strategy could reach a review. 25 October: the list is ordered by forward results (a strategy's forward net R in its own standard deviations, counted from 20 trading days and 10 trades) instead of by the share of conditions met, which becomes the first tie-break; "Recent 40 days" moves to forward results once a strategy has 40 forward trading days. Made after the first forward trades. It changes the order of the list only, not what any strategy must meet. 26 October: our 40-day check on each strategy's page and in "Recent 40 days" is graded every day on the backtest and forward-tracked trades together, with the same rules as the pages of the strategies we offer, instead of on the backtest alone until enough forward trades exist; weekdays between the end of a backtest and the start of tracking count as zero. Made after the first forward trades. It changes what is shown, not the order of the list or what any strategy must meet. 29 October: each strategy's page and "Recent 40 days" also show its form, where today's 40-day total sits against its own standard deviation (Strong run, Positive, Soft patch, Weak run), how many of the 40 days were forward-tracked, and a note when it is within one standard deviation of its pause line. Made after the first forward trades. It changes what is shown, not the grade, the order of the list or what any strategy must meet. 29 October: the 20 October comparison with the strategies we already offer is withdrawn on both routes; each strategy is judged on its own results, and none is shown as benched. Made after the first forward trades; while it applied, two of the six standard-route strategies were ahead of the strategy we offer on their market and four were behind, so withdrawing it removes a bar four strategies had not met. No strategy had reached a review.

  1. Standard route. Its 3-year backtest meets tests 1 to 4 of the five tests, and its forward-tracked trades then meet the forward gates below. Test 5, the drawdown test, is shown as a target here. Before a strategy is offered it must also meet test 5.
  2. Regime route. For a strategy we picked because of how it trades in recent market conditions, declared before its tracking began. Its backtest is shown but not tested; it qualifies on its forward-tracked trades alone, with a higher bar per trade and one extra check.
  3. Small-target strategies. A strategy that risks several times its target can be declared, before its tracking began, to have test 1 judged on two measures together: at least +0.10 per trade in units of its target, and costs at most a third of its gross result per trade. Both its figures and the usual one are shown.
Forward gates: at least 60 trading days and 30 trades; a positive result per trade after costs (at least +0.10R on the regime route); a drawdown no deeper than the worst in its backtest; a 40-day running total that never falls more than two standard deviations below zero; and, on the regime route, our 40-day check, which looks only at its recent 40-day results, rating it GOOD or HEALTHY (the top two of its four grades) at the review. Meeting them makes a strategy eligible. Offering it is a separate decision. A strategy that qualifies on the regime route has not passed the five tests on its 3-year backtest, so before offering one we would update our published rule and say so on its page.

CFTC Rule 4.41 statement. These results are based on simulated or hypothetical performance results that have certain inherent limitations. Unlike the results shown in an actual performance record, these results do not represent actual trading. Also, because these trades have not actually been executed, these results may have under-or over-compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Simulated or hypothetical trading programs in general are also subject to the fact that they are designed with the benefit of hindsight. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to these being shown.